Secondary Methods for Teaching Diverse Students - Ed 366
King’s College
Fall, 2008
Tuesdays & Thursdays
Instructor: A. Keith Dils, Ed.D.
Office: 219 Administration, 208-5900 ext. 5385. Office Hours 9:00-11:00 M-Th or by appointment.
Email: kdils@kings.edu
Website: http://staff.kings.edu/kdils/
Course Description: Designed to assist middle and secondary school content teachers to develop their abilities in instructional planning and instructional delivery concerning diverse students. Students will publish web-based units to the Internet. This will be done not only to demonstrate the teacher candidates' ability to use the latest interactive technology, but to also demonstrate their ability to apply course readings and to design learning experiences that are likely to promote learning for diverse learners. Rather than promoting the use of specific technologies or software programs, the technology-based projects are intended to provide teacher candidates with learning experiences that encourage the application of principles that can be applied in all teaching settings (with or without the specific technology used in class).
Objectives: Students will be able to describe the essential principles of teaching and learning. Students will be able to identify the needs of diverse student populations and to describe appropriate pedagogical methods for satisfying those needs. Students will be able to analyze instructional problems and communicate potential solutions via discussion, formal papers, and digital technologies. Students will be able to apply the concepts covered in the class to mock teaching situations. Students will demonstrate ability to plan to accommodate lessons in order to lead diverse learners to reach stated learning objectives.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Program Standards:
Students will be introduced to the following:
Project Aligned with NCATE and Individual SPA Program Standards
Standard 4: Instructional Strategies
Standard 7: Instructional Planning
Standard 8: Assessment
Standard 10: Collaboration
INTASC Standards (INTASC Standards found here: http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/corestrd.pdf):
Click here for a grid that maps this course's learning experiences with INTASC standards
Grading:
1. 10%=Class Participation
-Students should read the assigned pages prior to class and be prepared to discuss the contents (please bring books to class). Much of the course will be taught in a "student-centered" fashion. Success of the class can depend on the quality of each student's participation. Therefore, the quality of participation will be judged. Demonstrate that you are doing the readings.
-Each unexcused absence (i.e., absences other than serious personal illness, family emergency, participation in college sanctioned activities, or another such compelling cause supported by WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION) will result in a 10% reduction of your classroom discussion grade.
-Unprofessional conduct (e.g., walking in late to class, failing to be productive in in-class learning activities, etc.) will result in a grade reduction in this area.
2. 5% = Diversity guest speaker/video case study reflection paper (click here for assignment grading criteria/scoring rubric option I) or (click here for assignment option II) Due third class after presentation (King's Proficiencies 2.2, 2.3, 3.1)
3. 20% = Web-based unit - Click here for previous student examples - see below grading rubrics used to determine project grade
4. 15%=Midterm exam
5. 15%= Accommodations Project - expand one of the web-based interactive lessons to include accommodations that meet the needs of three different students with three different special needs (King's Proficiencies 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1 and PDE Special Needs Standards).
6. 15%=Final - Application of the essential principles covered in this course to the teaching of reading to secondary students/secondary literacy skills.
Take Home Final Grading Rubric (Concerning final lesson and two articles to be read) (King's Proficiencies 2.2, 2.3, 3.1 and PDE standards concerning literacy skills)
7. 20%= ELL Service Learning Project - Application of the essential principles covered in this course to the development of a Website housing ELL interventions, and collaboration with an in-service teacher and parent of ELL student to use the intervention
100%-95% = A, 94%-90%=A-, 89%-88% = B+, 87%-84%=B, 83%-80%=B-, 79%-78% = C+, 77%-74%=C, 73%-70%=C-, 69%-60% = D, 59% = F
Note:
Formal Acceptance to King's Teacher Education Program
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania requires teacher education programs to implement standards for formal acceptance into a teacher education program. The following GPA and Praxis requirements are used by King's College:
Required Reading:
Barzun, J. "Teacher in America"
Landsman, J and Lewis, C.W. (Eds). "White Teachers/Diverse Classrooms: A guide to building inclusive schools, promoting high expectations, and eliminating racism."
John Dewey, How We Think found online at:ELL: http://www.tesol.org/s_tesol/index.asp
PDE Standards for Special Needs and ELL: http://www.teaching.state.pa.us/teaching/lib/teaching/ELLandAdaptationsAccommodations5-5-08.pdf
Additional reading assignments:
(may be done online). See below and course outline for reading assignments.
Online Course on How to Teach Reading in Secondary Education: http://eric.indiana.edu/reading.
FrontPage Tutorials
King's College Teaching Observation Evaluation Form - click here
Course Outline:
WEEK 1
Problem of teaching: Case Study
Tuesday
What are the problems concerning teaching diverse students? click here for first lesson
Thursday
WEEK 2
Tuesday
Theories of Teaching
Thursday
Click here for lessons to analyze
WEEK 3
Tuesday
http://staff.kings.edu/kdils/InteractiveLessonPlanner/PointAtoPointBIndex.htm
WEEK 4
Tuesday September 30, 2008 - No Class, instead click on the following links and watch the following videos in order to answer the following questions. Bring your answers to the next class and be prepared to discuss.
Interactive Online Video Analysis of the use of the Interactive Lesson Planner
1. What is the purpose of this "Bell Ringer?"................... How does
this Bell Ringer build on students' prior knowledge? .....................
Describe a Bell Ringer that follows this model (i.e., build on prior knowledge,
get students' attention, get students actively involved) and describe how you
could apply it to a lesson you would possibly teach when student teaching.
2. What type of questions did the instructor use?............................How were visuals used to scaffold student responses?........................................Describe the visuals and questions you would use for a lesson you would likely teach during student teaching.
3. What things did the instructor do to structure the activity and to maintain classroom management?............................How was the instructor able to differentiate instruction (i.e., provide multiple pathways for learning)?........................................How did the instructor close the activity?.........................Describe what questions you would provide cooperative learning groups and how you would keep the students on-task and accountable for a specific lesson you would be likely to teach when student teaching.
4. Describe whether you think following the Interactive Lesson Planner
Click here to view the Interactive Lesson Planner by using a Bell Ringer,
Input (with questions and visuals), Group Activity (or other Practice or
Application Activity) and Closure in one lesson is an effective way to
differentiate instruction and to reach the diverse students you are likely to
teach. Be sure to defend your answers with reasons WHY.
Thursday - using pictures for Bell Ringers/Ant. Sets, Asking questions
WEEK 5
Tuesday -Due: 3 lesson plans. Plans will then be placed onto the Internet during lab.
3 web-based lessons centered around one topic. The topic is to be based on a PA State Standard in your discipline (click here for standards). The lesson will be posted online. It will be a usable lesson (rather than a lesson plan). The lesson is to follow the model found online at: http://www.kings.edu/kdils/InteractiveLessonPlanner/PointAtoPointBIndex.htm.
Thursday
Lab
FrontPage Tutorials
WEEK 6
Tuesday
Lab
Thursday -
Lab
WEEK 7
Input
A. http://staff.kings.edu/kdils/StudentWork/morgandills/lesson_plan_1.htm
vs.
B. http://staff.kings.edu/kdils/StudentWork/Baresse/Lesson%201.htm
C. http://staff.kings.edu/kdils/StudentWork/Lust/lesson_one.htm
vs.
Alternate Example: http://staff.kings.edu/kdils/StudentWork/Angela%20in%20Canterbury/Oleniacz/lesson2.html
Tuesday
Lab
Thursday
and Lab
-Together in class, put web-based lessons into a web-based, electronic portfolio
-Assignment - reflect how each "artifact" exemplifies your meeting INTASC Standards
WEEK 8
Tuesday Midterm Exam
Thursday
Presentations of Lesson
Critique lessons: Click here for rubric aligned with INTASC standards
Critique lessons: Click here for rubric aligned with INTASC standards
Lesson Critiques
Presentation of Lesson
http://ali.apple.com/ali_sites/ali/new_high.html
Week 9
Secondary Reading Strategies
ELL/ESL Accommodations
Lab
Week 10
Adaptations and accommodations
Click here for list of special needs
Differentiated Instruction
U.S. Department of State Resources on Special Needs
Click here for examples of how to teach diverse students
Lab
Inclusive classroom settings and cultural competency
Week 11
Reading assignment "White Teachers/Diverse Classrooms" to be assigned in class
In class: Director of the Office of Diversity Delight Yokley - discussion about teaching diverse students
Discussion and Feedback on Virtual Teaching Project
Week 12
Adaptations and accommodations - Brainstorm word assessment
Handout - King's College Rubric - proficiencies concerning assessment from King's Teacher Education Handbook
Online Quizzes II - http://www.funbrain.com and http://www.quizlab.com/
Week 13
"White Teachers/Diverse Classrooms" Video Case Study Assessment (click here for assignment) - In class assignment
Who are diverse students and what are some of the methods? - a summary
Week 14
ELL/ESL Accommodations Service Learning Reflections
Finals Week